PM Modi loyalists send threatening message to Mohan Bhagwat to bring down Govt if RSS insits on its choice of BJP President

PM Modi loyalists send threatening message to Mohan Bhagwat to bring down Govt if RSS insits on its choice of BJP President
PM Modi loyalists send threatening message to Mohan Bhagwat to bring down Govt if RSS insits on its choice of BJP President

 This write up presents political analysis revolving around a significant controversy in Indian politics concerning the age limit for leadership positions within the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat recently stated that leaders should retire after the age of 75. This statement directly impacted Prime Minister Narendra Modi and RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat, both of whom are nearing 75 in September. The debate centers on whether Modi will step down or continue beyond the traditional retirement age, as his supporters vehemently argue that he should remain in power, even up to 95 years old.

Nishikant Dubey, a BJP MP from Jharkhand, emerged as a vocal defender of Modi’s extended leadership, sending a clear message to Bhagwat and the RSS that Modi’s exit would destabilize BJP’s political dominance. This has triggered a political tussle between the BJP’s leadership and RSS, highlighting internal factionalism and power struggles it further explores the historical context of the 75-year retirement norm, which has been applied to many senior BJP leaders, but now appears selectively enforced or ignored when it comes to Modi.

The political significance of Modi’s leadership, portraying the BJP as a party built around his personality cult, indicating that without Modi, the party might lose its core support and electoral success. The analysis concludes by forecasting significant political turbulence within the BJP and the RSS over leadership succession, emphasizing the evolving dynamics and power balance between these two influential organizations in Indian politics.

Highlights

• 🔥 RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat’s 75-year retirement rule puts PM Modi and himself in the political spotlight.
• 🗣️ BJP MP Nishikant Dubey strongly defends Modi’s continuation beyond 75, even proposing leadership until 95.
• ⚔️ Clear tension and factionalism between BJP and RSS leadership regarding Modi’s future.
• 📜 Historical 75-year retirement norm selectively enforced within BJP, but challenged in Modi’s case.
• 🎭 Modi’s leadership viewed as central to BJP’s identity and political success.
• 🚨 Warnings that Modi’s departure could lead to BJP’s electoral downfall and internal splits.
• 🔮 Political future of BJP and RSS deeply uncertain amid leadership power struggle.

Key Insights

• 🧓 Age and Leadership Norms Are Being Politicized: The traditional 75-year retirement rule—previously strictly applied to many senior BJP leaders—is now contested when it concerns Narendra Modi, illustrating how political expediency can override established norms. This selective application signals a shift in party dynamics where the leader’s personal influence can outweigh organizational rules. The controversy reveals the fragility of institutional protocols in Indian politics when confronted with charismatic leadership.

• 🥇 Modi’s Persona Has Become Synonymous with BJP’s Identity: Statements from BJP insiders, especially Nishikant Dubey, emphasize that Modi is not just a leader but the embodiment of the party itself. Something when Dev Kant Barua said for Indira "Indira is India and India is Indira.There is No difference from Congress that ‘Modi-centric’ identity suggests the BJP has evolved from a collective leadership model to a personality-driven political machine. The potential risks of this persona cult include the party’s over-reliance on a single individual for electoral success, raising questions about succession planning and internal democracy.

• 🏛️ RSS-BJP Relationship Under Strain: The RSS, traditionally the ideological parent of BJP, seems to be in a delicate balancing act, caught between enforcing its organizational discipline (like the 75-year rule) and accommodating Modi’s political dominance. The public debate launched by BJP leaders against RSS’s directive indicates a rare open conflict, suggesting RSS’s influence over BJP might be waning or contested. This tension could have long-term implications for how BJP is governed and how much autonomy Modi’s faction wields within the party.

• 🚦 Political Messaging and Power Play: The strategic use of media, such as Nishikant Dubey’s podcast and public statements, indicates that BJP’s leadership is actively crafting a narrative to justify Modi’s extended rule. By framing Modi’s leadership as indispensable for India’s future and BJP’s survival, they are preemptively countering any moves by RSS or dissenting voices to enforce retirement. This demonstrates how political communication is used to control intra-party debates and shape public opinion.

• ⚖️ Factionalism and Future Instability within BJP: It is  highlighted that there is emerging factional divides within BJP, especially between leaders loyal to Modi-Shah and others aligned with RSS. This fragmentation could undermine party unity if succession issues are not resolved amicably. The fact that many BJP MPs are not original party members but come from other parties adds complexity to internal cohesion, potentially destabilizing BJP’s long-term organizational structure.

• 🔍 Historical Precedents of Leadership Transition: The  past BJP and RSS leadership transitions, including the retirement of senior leaders like Lal Krishna Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi, and others under the 75-year rule. This historical context underscores that the current debate is unprecedented in terms of Modi’s refusal or the party’s reluctance to apply the same principle to its most prominent leader. It suggests that Modi’s tenure marks a new era in Indian politics, where traditions may be reshaped.

• 🌐 Implications for India’s Political Future: The ongoing tussle between Modi’s faction and RSS not only affects BJP’s internal politics but also has broader implications for India’s democratic institutions and governance. The centralization of power around one individual challenges collective decision-making norms and may influence policy continuity, government accountability, and political stability. The debate over Modi’s political longevity reflects larger questions about leadership, age, capability, and democratic renewal in India.

Conclusion

This comprehensive political discussion sheds light on a critical juncture for Indian politics, focusing on the tension between organizational rules and individual dominance within the BJP-RSS ecosystem. The 75-year retirement rule, once a strict guideline, now faces challenge as Modi’s supporters push for his extended leadership, signaling a shift from collective leadership to a personality-driven model. The unfolding power struggle between BJP and RSS underscores the complex interplay of ideology, loyalty, and pragmatism in India’s ruling party. The outcome of this contest will shape the future trajectory of BJP, RSS, and the Indian political landscape at large.

via Blogger https://ift.tt/Jh5BOfv
July 19, 2025 at 10:13AM
via Blogger https://ift.tt/8ricRtI
July 19, 2025 at 11:13AM

PM Modi loyalists send threatening message to Mohan Bhagwat to bring down Govt if RSS insits on its choice of BJP President

PM Modi loyalists send threatening message to Mohan Bhagwat to bring down Govt if RSS insits on its choice of BJP President

 This write up presents political analysis revolving around a significant controversy in Indian politics concerning the age limit for leadership positions within the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat recently stated that leaders should retire after the age of 75. This statement directly impacted Prime Minister Narendra Modi and RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat, both of whom are nearing 75 in September. The debate centers on whether Modi will step down or continue beyond the traditional retirement age, as his supporters vehemently argue that he should remain in power, even up to 95 years old.

Nishikant Dubey, a BJP MP from Jharkhand, emerged as a vocal defender of Modi’s extended leadership, sending a clear message to Bhagwat and the RSS that Modi’s exit would destabilize BJP’s political dominance. This has triggered a political tussle between the BJP’s leadership and RSS, highlighting internal factionalism and power struggles it further explores the historical context of the 75-year retirement norm, which has been applied to many senior BJP leaders, but now appears selectively enforced or ignored when it comes to Modi.

The political significance of Modi’s leadership, portraying the BJP as a party built around his personality cult, indicating that without Modi, the party might lose its core support and electoral success. The analysis concludes by forecasting significant political turbulence within the BJP and the RSS over leadership succession, emphasizing the evolving dynamics and power balance between these two influential organizations in Indian politics.

Highlights

• 🔥 RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat’s 75-year retirement rule puts PM Modi and himself in the political spotlight.
• 🗣️ BJP MP Nishikant Dubey strongly defends Modi’s continuation beyond 75, even proposing leadership until 95.
• ⚔️ Clear tension and factionalism between BJP and RSS leadership regarding Modi’s future.
• 📜 Historical 75-year retirement norm selectively enforced within BJP, but challenged in Modi’s case.
• 🎭 Modi’s leadership viewed as central to BJP’s identity and political success.
• 🚨 Warnings that Modi’s departure could lead to BJP’s electoral downfall and internal splits.
• 🔮 Political future of BJP and RSS deeply uncertain amid leadership power struggle.

Key Insights

• 🧓 Age and Leadership Norms Are Being Politicized: The traditional 75-year retirement rule—previously strictly applied to many senior BJP leaders—is now contested when it concerns Narendra Modi, illustrating how political expediency can override established norms. This selective application signals a shift in party dynamics where the leader’s personal influence can outweigh organizational rules. The controversy reveals the fragility of institutional protocols in Indian politics when confronted with charismatic leadership.

• 🥇 Modi’s Persona Has Become Synonymous with BJP’s Identity: Statements from BJP insiders, especially Nishikant Dubey, emphasize that Modi is not just a leader but the embodiment of the party itself. Something when Dev Kant Barua said for Indira "Indira is India and India is Indira.There is No difference from Congress that ‘Modi-centric’ identity suggests the BJP has evolved from a collective leadership model to a personality-driven political machine. The potential risks of this persona cult include the party’s over-reliance on a single individual for electoral success, raising questions about succession planning and internal democracy.

• 🏛️ RSS-BJP Relationship Under Strain: The RSS, traditionally the ideological parent of BJP, seems to be in a delicate balancing act, caught between enforcing its organizational discipline (like the 75-year rule) and accommodating Modi’s political dominance. The public debate launched by BJP leaders against RSS’s directive indicates a rare open conflict, suggesting RSS’s influence over BJP might be waning or contested. This tension could have long-term implications for how BJP is governed and how much autonomy Modi’s faction wields within the party.

• 🚦 Political Messaging and Power Play: The strategic use of media, such as Nishikant Dubey’s podcast and public statements, indicates that BJP’s leadership is actively crafting a narrative to justify Modi’s extended rule. By framing Modi’s leadership as indispensable for India’s future and BJP’s survival, they are preemptively countering any moves by RSS or dissenting voices to enforce retirement. This demonstrates how political communication is used to control intra-party debates and shape public opinion.

• ⚖️ Factionalism and Future Instability within BJP: It is  highlighted that there is emerging factional divides within BJP, especially between leaders loyal to Modi-Shah and others aligned with RSS. This fragmentation could undermine party unity if succession issues are not resolved amicably. The fact that many BJP MPs are not original party members but come from other parties adds complexity to internal cohesion, potentially destabilizing BJP’s long-term organizational structure.

• 🔍 Historical Precedents of Leadership Transition: The  past BJP and RSS leadership transitions, including the retirement of senior leaders like Lal Krishna Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi, and others under the 75-year rule. This historical context underscores that the current debate is unprecedented in terms of Modi’s refusal or the party’s reluctance to apply the same principle to its most prominent leader. It suggests that Modi’s tenure marks a new era in Indian politics, where traditions may be reshaped.

• 🌐 Implications for India’s Political Future: The ongoing tussle between Modi’s faction and RSS not only affects BJP’s internal politics but also has broader implications for India’s democratic institutions and governance. The centralization of power around one individual challenges collective decision-making norms and may influence policy continuity, government accountability, and political stability. The debate over Modi’s political longevity reflects larger questions about leadership, age, capability, and democratic renewal in India.

Conclusion

This comprehensive political discussion sheds light on a critical juncture for Indian politics, focusing on the tension between organizational rules and individual dominance within the BJP-RSS ecosystem. The 75-year retirement rule, once a strict guideline, now faces challenge as Modi’s supporters push for his extended leadership, signaling a shift from collective leadership to a personality-driven model. The unfolding power struggle between BJP and RSS underscores the complex interplay of ideology, loyalty, and pragmatism in India’s ruling party. The outcome of this contest will shape the future trajectory of BJP, RSS, and the Indian political landscape at large.

via Blogger https://ift.tt/Jh5BOfv
July 19, 2025 at 10:13AM

PM Modi loyalists send threatening message to Mohan Bhagwat to bring down Govt if RSS insits on its choice of BJP President

 This write up presents political analysis revolving around a significant controversy in Indian politics concerning the age limit for leadership positions within the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat recently stated that leaders should retire after the age of 75. This statement directly impacted Prime Minister Narendra Modi and RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat, both of whom are nearing 75 in September. The debate centers on whether Modi will step down or continue beyond the traditional retirement age, as his supporters vehemently argue that he should remain in power, even up to 95 years old.

Nishikant Dubey, a BJP MP from Jharkhand, emerged as a vocal defender of Modi’s extended leadership, sending a clear message to Bhagwat and the RSS that Modi’s exit would destabilize BJP’s political dominance. This has triggered a political tussle between the BJP’s leadership and RSS, highlighting internal factionalism and power struggles it further explores the historical context of the 75-year retirement norm, which has been applied to many senior BJP leaders, but now appears selectively enforced or ignored when it comes to Modi.

The political significance of Modi’s leadership, portraying the BJP as a party built around his personality cult, indicating that without Modi, the party might lose its core support and electoral success. The analysis concludes by forecasting significant political turbulence within the BJP and the RSS over leadership succession, emphasizing the evolving dynamics and power balance between these two influential organizations in Indian politics.

Highlights

• 🔥 RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat’s 75-year retirement rule puts PM Modi and himself in the political spotlight.
• 🗣️ BJP MP Nishikant Dubey strongly defends Modi’s continuation beyond 75, even proposing leadership until 95.
• ⚔️ Clear tension and factionalism between BJP and RSS leadership regarding Modi’s future.
• 📜 Historical 75-year retirement norm selectively enforced within BJP, but challenged in Modi’s case.
• 🎭 Modi’s leadership viewed as central to BJP’s identity and political success.
• 🚨 Warnings that Modi’s departure could lead to BJP’s electoral downfall and internal splits.
• 🔮 Political future of BJP and RSS deeply uncertain amid leadership power struggle.

Key Insights

• 🧓 Age and Leadership Norms Are Being Politicized: The traditional 75-year retirement rule—previously strictly applied to many senior BJP leaders—is now contested when it concerns Narendra Modi, illustrating how political expediency can override established norms. This selective application signals a shift in party dynamics where the leader’s personal influence can outweigh organizational rules. The controversy reveals the fragility of institutional protocols in Indian politics when confronted with charismatic leadership.

• 🥇 Modi’s Persona Has Become Synonymous with BJP’s Identity: Statements from BJP insiders, especially Nishikant Dubey, emphasize that Modi is not just a leader but the embodiment of the party itself. Something when Dev Kant Barua said for Indira "Indira is India and India is Indira.There is No difference from Congress that ‘Modi-centric’ identity suggests the BJP has evolved from a collective leadership model to a personality-driven political machine. The potential risks of this persona cult include the party’s over-reliance on a single individual for electoral success, raising questions about succession planning and internal democracy.

• 🏛️ RSS-BJP Relationship Under Strain: The RSS, traditionally the ideological parent of BJP, seems to be in a delicate balancing act, caught between enforcing its organizational discipline (like the 75-year rule) and accommodating Modi’s political dominance. The public debate launched by BJP leaders against RSS’s directive indicates a rare open conflict, suggesting RSS’s influence over BJP might be waning or contested. This tension could have long-term implications for how BJP is governed and how much autonomy Modi’s faction wields within the party.

• 🚦 Political Messaging and Power Play: The strategic use of media, such as Nishikant Dubey’s podcast and public statements, indicates that BJP’s leadership is actively crafting a narrative to justify Modi’s extended rule. By framing Modi’s leadership as indispensable for India’s future and BJP’s survival, they are preemptively countering any moves by RSS or dissenting voices to enforce retirement. This demonstrates how political communication is used to control intra-party debates and shape public opinion.

• ⚖️ Factionalism and Future Instability within BJP: It is  highlighted that there is emerging factional divides within BJP, especially between leaders loyal to Modi-Shah and others aligned with RSS. This fragmentation could undermine party unity if succession issues are not resolved amicably. The fact that many BJP MPs are not original party members but come from other parties adds complexity to internal cohesion, potentially destabilizing BJP’s long-term organizational structure.

• 🔍 Historical Precedents of Leadership Transition: The  past BJP and RSS leadership transitions, including the retirement of senior leaders like Lal Krishna Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi, and others under the 75-year rule. This historical context underscores that the current debate is unprecedented in terms of Modi’s refusal or the party’s reluctance to apply the same principle to its most prominent leader. It suggests that Modi’s tenure marks a new era in Indian politics, where traditions may be reshaped.

• 🌐 Implications for India’s Political Future: The ongoing tussle between Modi’s faction and RSS not only affects BJP’s internal politics but also has broader implications for India’s democratic institutions and governance. The centralization of power around one individual challenges collective decision-making norms and may influence policy continuity, government accountability, and political stability. The debate over Modi’s political longevity reflects larger questions about leadership, age, capability, and democratic renewal in India.

Conclusion

This comprehensive political discussion sheds light on a critical juncture for Indian politics, focusing on the tension between organizational rules and individual dominance within the BJP-RSS ecosystem. The 75-year retirement rule, once a strict guideline, now faces challenge as Modi’s supporters push for his extended leadership, signaling a shift from collective leadership to a personality-driven model. The unfolding power struggle between BJP and RSS underscores the complex interplay of ideology, loyalty, and pragmatism in India’s ruling party. The outcome of this contest will shape the future trajectory of BJP, RSS, and the Indian political landscape at large.

Syria's al-Sharaa ‘not afraid’, vows justice for attacks on Druze people; Israel continues to strike Damascus

Syria's al-Sharaa ‘not afraid’, vows justice for attacks on Druze people; Israel continues to strike Damascus

 

Syria's al-Sharaa ‘not afraid’, vows justice for attacks on Druze people; Israel continues to strike Damascus

On Thursday, interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa of Syria emphasized that protecting the rights and safety of the Druze community is of utmost importance after Israel's commitment to take action against Syrian forces alleged to have assaulted Druze populations in the southern regions of Syria. In his first public statement broadcasted since Israel's recent intensive air assaults on Damascus, Sharaa reassured the Druze, declaring, “We will not allow any foreign entities to manipulate your situation.”

“We do not count ourselves among those who shy away from conflict. We have always confronted challenges and stood up for our people, prioritizing Syrian interests over chaos and devastation,” he stated, as per a report by Reuters. He went on to declare that Syrians are not afraid of warfare and stand ready to defend their honor if it is at stake.

Furthermore, Sharaa denounced Israel's extensive strikes on civilian and governmental locations, vowing to bring to justice anyone who has wronged the Druze community, according to AFP. He indicated that the security within Druze regions would be managed by local leaders and community groups. Sharaa is facing the challenge of unifying Syria amid significant mistrust among different factions worried about the possible emergence of Islamist governance. Tensions escalated in March due to mass killings targeting the Alawite minority, which further complicated community relations, as reported by Reuters.

The United Nations Security Council is scheduled to convene on Thursday to discuss the ongoing conflict, according to diplomats. “The council must denounce the atrocious acts perpetrated against innocent civilians on Syrian territory,” stated Israel's representative to the U.N., Danny Danon, as reported by Reuters. “Israel will persist in its firm stance against any terrorist threats along its borders, at any place and time.”

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio mentioned that all involved parties in the conflicts have agreed to soon cease the violence. In a statement on X, he noted, “We have come to an agreement on concrete measures that will bring this alarming and dreadful situation to a conclusion tonight,” though he did not share specifics. Rubio previously expressed that the U.S. is “very concerned” and “we wish for it to stop,” but refrained from urging Israel to cease its military actions.

via Blogger https://ift.tt/sJHeVwp
July 17, 2025 at 03:47PM

Air India incident: Investigators examine ‘un-commanded switch transition’ of fuel controls on AI 171 — What this indicates

Air India incident: Investigators examine ‘un-commanded switch transition’ of fuel controls on AI 171 — What this indicates

 

Air India incident: Investigators examine ‘un-commanded switch transition’ of fuel controls on AI 171 — What this indicates

The AAIB report published on July 12 stated that the Air India flight headed for London encountered a “fuel cut-off” just moments after takeoff from Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport (VAAH) on June 12.

Investigation into the Air India-Boeing crash: Following the release of the AAIB report, a news source indicated that investigators are looking into potential issues with the aircraft's electrical and software systems, which may have led to “uncommanded” behavior.

“The investigation will determine the likelihood of an ‘un-commanded transition’ of the fuel control switches to the off position shortly after takeoff,” sources informed 

‘Fuel cut-off’: Insights from the AAIB report regarding the Air India crash

The AAIB report made available on July 12 mentioned that the flight to London faced a “fuel cut-off” only seconds after leaving Ahmedabad’s Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport (VAAH) on June 12.

As indicated by the cockpit voice recorder, the pilot denied the action of shutting off the fuel. One pilot was overheard asking, “Why did you cut off?” and the other responded, “I did not do that.”

In the cockpit, two switches are responsible for managing the fuel supply to the engine. The transition to “cut-off” is generally executed only after the aircraft has landed.

Pilots use these switches to initiate or turn off engines when on the ground or to manually shut down or restart engines in case of in-flight engine failure. Aviation specialists assert that it is unlikely for a pilot to inadvertently adjust the fuel switches that supply the engines.

To activate the fuel supply, the switch must be pulled out and moved to a “RUN” position, where it locks back into place. To deactivate the fuel supply, the switch needs to be pulled out once more, shifted to the “CUTOFF” position, and then released again.

via Blogger https://ift.tt/bcdrx65
July 17, 2025 at 03:39PM

Date of Birth Analysis through Lo Shu Grid

                              Date of Birth Analysis through Lo Shu Grid

      

       

Introduction

Why Your Insights and Perspectives Are Crucial for Brands (and Yourself)  

https://ift.tt/t6diIGX 

https://ift.tt/pB8rGCF2025

 https://ift.tt/ozPK1Uf   Join and Earn in $

 https://ift.tt/u1QmLSh   Join now

 Lo Shu Grid is an ancient Chinese numerology technique used for personality analysis, life predictions, and self-discovery. It originated from the Lo Shu Square, a 3x3 magic square with deep mystical significance in Chinese metaphysics. By analyzing an individual's date of birth, the Lo Shu Grid provides insights into strengths, weaknesses, and life paths.

History of Lo Shu Grid

The Lo Shu Square traces back to ancient China, where it was discovered on the back of a divine turtle emerging from the Luo River. This square, consisting of numbers 1 to 9 arranged in a 3x3 grid, is the foundation of numerology-based life analysis. Over time, the Lo Shu Grid became a crucial tool in Feng Shui and personal numerology.

How to Create a Lo Shu Grid

1. Write down the date of birth (DD/MM/YYYY) and separate the digits.

2. Place the digits in the corresponding grid positions:

   • 1: Represents Water (North) - Communication, intelligence
   • 2: Represents Earth (Southwest) - Relationships, sensitivity
   • 3: Represents Wood (East) - Creativity, expression
   • 4: Represents Wood (Southeast) - Planning, discipline
   • 5: Represents Earth (Center) - Adaptability, balance
   • 6: Represents Metal (Northwest) - Responsibility, wealth
   • 7: Represents Metal (West) - Wisdom, spirituality
   • 8: Represents Earth (Northeast) - Stability, inner strength
   • 9: Represents Fire (South) - Energy, leadership

3. Interpret the grid based on the presence or absence of numbers in each box.

Interpreting the Lo Shu Grid

• Missing Numbers: Represents weak areas in life requiring effort.
• Repeated Numbers: Signify strengths, dominant traits, or excessive tendencies.
• Number Combinations:
  • 1, 2, 3: Good communication and social skills.
  • 4, 5, 6: Practical and career-oriented.
  • 7, 8, 9: Spiritually inclined and intuitive.

Example of Lo Shu Grid Calculation

For a person born on 15/07/1992: Digits: 1, 5, 0, 7, 1, 9, 9, 2

4		9
	5	7
1		2

• Missing 3, 6, 8 suggests a need to develop creativity, financial discipline, and inner stability.
• Repeated 1 and 9 signifies strong leadership and intellectual capacity.

Conclusion

The Lo Shu Grid is a simple yet powerful method to gain insights into one’s personality and destiny. It helps individuals recognize their strengths and work on their weaknesses for a balanced life. Regularly analyzing and applying the principles of the Lo Shu Grid can lead to better decision-making and self-awareness.

For Analysis and Remedies of your DOB  Please pay Rs 2000/$20 through Pay Pal shuksrp@gmail.com or UPI 9868031897@ybl. Whats app DOB on +91986803189

Syria's al-Sharaa ‘not afraid’, vows justice for attacks on Druze people; Israel continues to strike Damascus

 

Syria's al-Sharaa ‘not afraid’, vows justice for attacks on Druze people; Israel continues to strike Damascus

On Thursday, interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa of Syria emphasized that protecting the rights and safety of the Druze community is of utmost importance after Israel's commitment to take action against Syrian forces alleged to have assaulted Druze populations in the southern regions of Syria. In his first public statement broadcasted since Israel's recent intensive air assaults on Damascus, Sharaa reassured the Druze, declaring, “We will not allow any foreign entities to manipulate your situation.”

“We do not count ourselves among those who shy away from conflict. We have always confronted challenges and stood up for our people, prioritizing Syrian interests over chaos and devastation,” he stated, as per a report by Reuters. He went on to declare that Syrians are not afraid of warfare and stand ready to defend their honor if it is at stake.

Furthermore, Sharaa denounced Israel's extensive strikes on civilian and governmental locations, vowing to bring to justice anyone who has wronged the Druze community, according to AFP. He indicated that the security within Druze regions would be managed by local leaders and community groups. Sharaa is facing the challenge of unifying Syria amid significant mistrust among different factions worried about the possible emergence of Islamist governance. Tensions escalated in March due to mass killings targeting the Alawite minority, which further complicated community relations, as reported by Reuters.

The United Nations Security Council is scheduled to convene on Thursday to discuss the ongoing conflict, according to diplomats. “The council must denounce the atrocious acts perpetrated against innocent civilians on Syrian territory,” stated Israel's representative to the U.N., Danny Danon, as reported by Reuters. “Israel will persist in its firm stance against any terrorist threats along its borders, at any place and time.”

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio mentioned that all involved parties in the conflicts have agreed to soon cease the violence. In a statement on X, he noted, “We have come to an agreement on concrete measures that will bring this alarming and dreadful situation to a conclusion tonight,” though he did not share specifics. Rubio previously expressed that the U.S. is “very concerned” and “we wish for it to stop,” but refrained from urging Israel to cease its military actions.