https://www.profitableratecpm.com/shc711j7ic?key=ff7159c55aa2fea5a5e4cdda1135ce92 Best Information at Shuksgyan: IFTTT

Pages

Showing posts with label IFTTT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IFTTT. Show all posts

Monday, February 2, 2026

Exclusive research on PM Narendra Modi Govt Spending on SC ST OBC & Muslims of India- 2014-2026

Exclusive research on PM Narendra Modi Govt Spending on SC ST OBC & Muslims of India- 2014-2026
Exclusive research on PM Narendra Modi Govt Spending on SC ST OBC & Muslims of India- 2014-2026
Exclusive research on PM Narendra Modi Govt Spending on SC ST OBC & Muslims of India- 2014-2026
Exclusive research on PM Narendra Modi Govt Spending on SC ST OBC & Muslims of India- 2014-2026

This is my exclusive research on PM Narendra Modi Govt Spending on SC ST OBC & Muslims of India.Research does not include Islamic Countries which are regulary Funded by current Govt to help Muslim Population of those countries

Key Points on Government Spending and Schemes (2014-2025)
  • Research suggests that the Modi government has substantially increased welfare allocations for Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), Other Backward Classes (OBC), and minority communities, including Muslims, over the past 11 years, with budgets rising from around ₹50,000 crore in 2014-15 to over ₹2.5 lakh crore annually by 2025-26 across targeted schemes—reflecting a focus on affirmative action for historically disadvantaged groups.
  • Specific schemes include scholarships, skill development, and economic empowerment programs like Post-Matric Scholarships for SC/ST/OBC (over ₹40,000 crore disbursed since 2014) and minority welfare initiatives (around ₹40,000-45,000 crore cumulative), but data shows uneven utilization in some years due to implementation challenges.
  • There are no exclusive government schemes targeted solely at the general category, as India's affirmative action framework prioritizes backward classes; however, general category citizens benefit from universal programs like PM-KISAN (income support for farmers) and Ayushman Bharat (health insurance), which cover all eligible individuals regardless of caste.
  • Evidence leans toward affirmative action as a tool to address historical inequalities rather than discrimination against the general category; while debates exist on "reverse discrimination" in reservations, constitutional provisions emphasize uplifting marginalized groups without barring general access to merit-based opportunities—any perceived bias is often linked to broader socio-economic complexities.

Overview of Spending on SC, ST, OBC, and Muslim Communities

The Modi government, in power since 2014, has emphasized welfare for disadvantaged groups through increased budgetary allocations. Total spending on SC/ST welfare has grown from approximately ₹30,000-50,000 crore in 2014-15 to over ₹2.5 lakh crore in recent budgets, with a focus on education, skill development, and economic inclusion. For minorities (including Muslims, who form the largest group), allocations under the Ministry of Minority Affairs peaked at around ₹5,000 crore in 2022-23 but have stabilized at ₹3,000-3,500 crore annually, supporting scholarships and development programs. Data from official sources like the Union Budget and PIB indicate a 200-300% rise in tribal welfare budgets alone, though actual expenditure sometimes falls short due to state-level implementation issues.

Key Schemes and Allocations

Major schemes target SC, ST, OBC, and minorities, with detailed budgets drawn from government reports. For instance:

  • Post-Matric Scholarship for SCs: Over ₹30,000 crore disbursed since 2014, benefiting 4 crore+ students (2025-26 allocation: ₹6,000 crore).
  • Pradhan Mantri Adi Adarsh Gram Yojana (for STs): Focuses on tribal village development; budget rose from ₹1,000 crore in 2021-22 to ₹1,500 crore in 2025-26.
  • Post-Matric Scholarship for OBCs: Around ₹10,000 crore spent since 2014; 2025-26: ₹1,000 crore.
  • Minority Scholarships (for Muslims and others): Cumulative ₹20,000 crore+; Pre/Post-Matric schemes benefited 2.5 crore Muslims (2025-26: ₹678 crore for education empowerment).

These schemes aim to bridge socio-economic gaps, with Muslims comprising 70-80% of minority beneficiaries in education programs.

Perspective on General Category and Claims of Discrimination

India's welfare policies are rooted in the Constitution's directive for affirmative action to uplift backward classes, not to exclude the general category. Universal schemes like PM-KISAN (₹63,500 crore in 2025-26, benefiting 11 crore farmers) and Stand-Up India (loans for entrepreneurs) are open to all, including general category citizens. The 10% EWS quota (introduced in 2019) provides reservations for economically weaker general category individuals in jobs and education. While some argue that targeted schemes create "reverse discrimination," evidence from reports like those from the National Commission for Backward Classes suggests these measures address centuries-old inequalities without systematically disadvantaging the general category—general candidates still access 40-50% of opportunities on merit. Claims of discrimination often overlook that general category poverty is addressed through non-caste-specific anti-poverty programs.


Detailed Survey of Government Welfare Spending, Schemes, and Equity Policies (2014-2025)

This comprehensive review examines the Modi government's welfare expenditures on Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), Other Backward Classes (OBC), and Muslim communities over the last 11 years, based on official data from Union Budgets, Press Information Bureau (PIB) releases, and parliamentary responses. It includes breakdowns of key schemes, budget trends, and a balanced discussion on equity for the general category. The analysis draws from authenticated sources to ensure accuracy, highlighting growth in allocations while noting implementation gaps. Affirmative action in India stems from constitutional mandates (Articles 15-16, 46) to promote social justice for historically marginalized groups, without implying discrimination against others.

Budget Trends and Total Spending Overview

Welfare allocations for SC, ST, OBC, and minorities have seen substantial growth under the Modi government, reflecting a policy emphasis on "Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas" (inclusive development). Cumulative spending exceeds ₹15-20 lakh crore across categories, with annual budgets tripling in some areas. However:

  • SC Welfare: Allocations under the Allocation for Welfare of Scheduled Castes (AWSC) rose from ₹50,548 crore (BE 2014-15) to ₹165,493 crore (BE 2024-25), a 227% increase. Actual expenditure averaged 85-95% of revised estimates, totaling around ₹8-10 lakh crore cumulatively. Key drivers include scholarships and economic empowerment.
  • ST Welfare: Budgets surged from ₹4,498 crore (2014-15) to ₹14,926 crore (2025-26), a 231% rise per PIB data. Cumulative spending: ~₹1-1.5 lakh crore, with focus on tribal development.
  • OBC Welfare: Allocations under schemes like Post-Matric Scholarships grew from ₹1,758 crore (2019-20) to ₹1,970 crore (2021-22), stabilizing at ₹1,800-2,000 crore annually. Total: ~₹20,000-25,000 crore, including skill programs.
  • Minority/Muslim Welfare: Under the Ministry of Minority Affairs, budgets peaked at ₹5,020 crore (2022-23) but declined to ₹3,350 crore (2025-26), a 17% drop from 2014-19 averages. Muslims, comprising ~70% of beneficiaries, received ~₹25,000-30,000 crore cumulatively through scholarships (e.g., 2.37 crore Muslim students benefited 2014-19). Overall minority spending: ₹40,000-45,000 crore.

Challenges include underutilization (e.g., 12.5% decline in minority scheme expenditure 2021-22) due to overlaps and state delays. Data from IndiaStat and Union Budgets show consistent upward trends until recent stabilizations.

Table 1: Year-Wise Allocations for SC/ST/OBC/Minority Welfare (in ₹ Crore, Approximate from Aggregated Sources)

Year SC Welfare (BE) ST Welfare (BE) OBC Welfare (Key Schemes) Minority/Muslim (BE)
2014-15 50,548 4,498 1,710 3,734
2015-16 30,851 ~5,000 1,710 3,738
2016-17 38,833 ~6,000 1,955 3,827
2017-18 52,393 ~7,000 1,955 4,195
2018-19 56,619 ~7,500 1,830 4,700
2019-20 81,341 ~8,000 1,830 4,700
2020-21 83,257 7,511 1,955 ~3,000
2021-22 126,259 7,995 1,970 5,021
2022-23 142,342 8,926 ~2,000 5,021
2023-24 159,148 11,951 ~1,800 3,098
2024-25 165,493 12,491 ~1,800 3,138
2025-26 ~170,000 (Est.) 14,926 ~2,000 3,350

*Sources: Union Budget Expenditure Profiles, PIB, IndiaStat. Note: Minority figures include broader programs; Muslim-specific data is ~70% of totals. Bar chart representation (simulated in markdown for visualization):

text
SC Welfare:  |||||||||||||||||||||||||| (165k Cr in 2024-25)
ST Welfare:  ||||||||||||||| (12k Cr)
OBC Welfare: ||||||||| (1.8k Cr)
Minority:    ||||||| (3.1k Cr)
(Scale: Each | = ~10k Cr)

Specific Schemes and Their Impact

The government runs over 30 targeted schemes, consolidated under umbrellas like PM-AJAY for SCs and PM Vanbandhu Kalyan Yojana for STs. Details:

  • For SCs:
    • Post-Matric Scholarship: ₹6,360 crore (2025-26); benefited 92 lakh students (2023-24).
    • PM-AJAY: ₹2,140 crore (2021-22); village development in SC-majority areas.
    • National Fellowship for SCs: ₹300 crore annually; supports higher education.
  • For STs:
    • Post-Matric Scholarship: ₹2,433 crore (2025-26); 18 lakh beneficiaries.
    • Eklavya Model Residential Schools: 477 sanctioned (up from 123 in 2013-14); ₹1,000 crore+ invested.
    • Pradhan Mantri Adi Adarsh Gram Yojana: Focuses on 1,000+ tribal villages.
  • For OBCs:
    • Post-Matric Scholarship: ₹921 crore (2025-26); 92 lakh beneficiaries cumulatively.
    • Dr. Ambedkar Scheme for OBCs/EBCs: Interest subsidy on overseas loans; ₹250 crore (2025-26).
    • SHREYAS: ₹472 crore for higher education.
  • For Muslims/Minorities:
    • Pre/Post-Matric Scholarships: ₹5,172 crore (2008-2023); 92 lakh beneficiaries, mostly Muslims.
    • Pradhan Mantri Jan Vikas Karyakram: ₹910 crore (2024-25); infrastructure in minority areas.
    • Begum Hazrat Mahal Scholarship: For minority girls; part of ₹678 crore education budget (2025-26).

These schemes have led to outcomes like reduced dropout rates (e.g., SC/ST enrollment up 20% per NFHS data) and increased economic participation (e.g., 71% PM Fasal Bima beneficiaries are SC/ST/OBC).

Table 2: Selected Schemes with Budgets and Beneficiaries (Cumulative 2014-2025)

Scheme Target Group Budget (Cumulative ₹ Cr) Beneficiaries (Approx.)
Post-Matric Scholarship SC 40,000+ 4 crore+
Pre-Matric Scholarship ST 15,000+ 1.5 crore
SHREYAS OBC 5,000 50 lakh
Minority Scholarships Muslims/Minorities 20,000+ 3 crore (2.37 crore Muslims)

Equity for General Category and Discrimination Debates

India's reservation system reserves ~50% seats/jobs for SC/ST/OBC (15% SC, 7.5% ST, 27% OBC), leaving ~40% for merit (open to all) and 10% for EWS in general category (introduced 2019). No schemes are "exclusive" to general category, as policies target backwardness per Constitution. General citizens access universal schemes:

  • PM-KISAN: ₹6,000/year to farmers; 80% small/marginal (includes general).
  • Ayushman Bharat: ₹5 lakh health cover; 55 crore beneficiaries.
  • PMAY: 4 crore houses; open to all BPL/EWS.

Claims of "discrimination" against general category arise from perceptions of "reverse discrimination" in reservations, but Supreme Court rulings (e.g., Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India, 2022) affirm these as tools for substantive equality, not bias. General category poverty (e.g., 10-15% of population) is addressed via EWS and anti-poverty programs. Debates highlight controversies: some view reservations as perpetuating caste divides, while evidence shows they reduce inequality (e.g., SC/ST poverty down 20% per NITI Aayog). No data supports systematic fund denial to general; instead, universal spending (~₹10-15 lakh crore annually) benefits all.

Table 3: Universal Schemes Benefiting General Category (2025-26 Allocations)

Scheme Focus Budget (₹ Cr) Beneficiaries
PM-KISAN Farmer Income 63,500 11 crore
Ayushman Bharat Health Insurance 1,16,000+ 55 crore
PMAY Housing 54,500 4 crore

In summary, while targeted spending uplifts marginalized groups, India's welfare ecosystem ensures broad access, promoting inclusive growth amid ongoing debates.

Key Citations

  • PIB: "Empowering Tribes Towards Viksit Bharat" (2025)
  • Union Budget: "Expenditure Profile 2026-2027"
  • IndiaStat: "Special Component Plan Expenditure"
  • Economic Times: "Union Budget 2025: Boost to Social Justice"
  • Ministry of Minority Affairs: "Empowering Minorities" (2024)
  • Wikipedia: "List of Schemes of the Government of India"
This research has copy right and can not be used by any one unless permission is sought in advance. Only references of this research can be made by indicating researchers credential
Please write your views and comments for furtherring my research efforts on  other important national issues.
Jai Hind Jai Sanatan


via Blogger https://ift.tt/pGmQeS0
February 02, 2026 at 09:37AM
via Blogger https://ift.tt/MmaWUDv
February 02, 2026 at 10:13AM
via Blogger https://ift.tt/kT5Rx3y
February 02, 2026 at 11:13AM
via Blogger https://ift.tt/sHQEpgF
February 02, 2026 at 12:13PM

Exclusive research on PM Narendra Modi Govt Spending on SC ST OBC & Muslims of India- 2014-2026

Exclusive research on PM Narendra Modi Govt Spending on SC ST OBC & Muslims of India- 2014-2026
Exclusive research on PM Narendra Modi Govt Spending on SC ST OBC & Muslims of India- 2014-2026
Exclusive research on PM Narendra Modi Govt Spending on SC ST OBC & Muslims of India- 2014-2026

This is my exclusive research on PM Narendra Modi Govt Spending on SC ST OBC & Muslims of India.Research does not include Islamic Countries which are regulary Funded by current Govt to help Muslim Population of those countries

Key Points on Government Spending and Schemes (2014-2025)
  • Research suggests that the Modi government has substantially increased welfare allocations for Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), Other Backward Classes (OBC), and minority communities, including Muslims, over the past 11 years, with budgets rising from around ₹50,000 crore in 2014-15 to over ₹2.5 lakh crore annually by 2025-26 across targeted schemes—reflecting a focus on affirmative action for historically disadvantaged groups.
  • Specific schemes include scholarships, skill development, and economic empowerment programs like Post-Matric Scholarships for SC/ST/OBC (over ₹40,000 crore disbursed since 2014) and minority welfare initiatives (around ₹40,000-45,000 crore cumulative), but data shows uneven utilization in some years due to implementation challenges.
  • There are no exclusive government schemes targeted solely at the general category, as India's affirmative action framework prioritizes backward classes; however, general category citizens benefit from universal programs like PM-KISAN (income support for farmers) and Ayushman Bharat (health insurance), which cover all eligible individuals regardless of caste.
  • Evidence leans toward affirmative action as a tool to address historical inequalities rather than discrimination against the general category; while debates exist on "reverse discrimination" in reservations, constitutional provisions emphasize uplifting marginalized groups without barring general access to merit-based opportunities—any perceived bias is often linked to broader socio-economic complexities.

Overview of Spending on SC, ST, OBC, and Muslim Communities

The Modi government, in power since 2014, has emphasized welfare for disadvantaged groups through increased budgetary allocations. Total spending on SC/ST welfare has grown from approximately ₹30,000-50,000 crore in 2014-15 to over ₹2.5 lakh crore in recent budgets, with a focus on education, skill development, and economic inclusion. For minorities (including Muslims, who form the largest group), allocations under the Ministry of Minority Affairs peaked at around ₹5,000 crore in 2022-23 but have stabilized at ₹3,000-3,500 crore annually, supporting scholarships and development programs. Data from official sources like the Union Budget and PIB indicate a 200-300% rise in tribal welfare budgets alone, though actual expenditure sometimes falls short due to state-level implementation issues.

Key Schemes and Allocations

Major schemes target SC, ST, OBC, and minorities, with detailed budgets drawn from government reports. For instance:

  • Post-Matric Scholarship for SCs: Over ₹30,000 crore disbursed since 2014, benefiting 4 crore+ students (2025-26 allocation: ₹6,000 crore).
  • Pradhan Mantri Adi Adarsh Gram Yojana (for STs): Focuses on tribal village development; budget rose from ₹1,000 crore in 2021-22 to ₹1,500 crore in 2025-26.
  • Post-Matric Scholarship for OBCs: Around ₹10,000 crore spent since 2014; 2025-26: ₹1,000 crore.
  • Minority Scholarships (for Muslims and others): Cumulative ₹20,000 crore+; Pre/Post-Matric schemes benefited 2.5 crore Muslims (2025-26: ₹678 crore for education empowerment).

These schemes aim to bridge socio-economic gaps, with Muslims comprising 70-80% of minority beneficiaries in education programs.

Perspective on General Category and Claims of Discrimination

India's welfare policies are rooted in the Constitution's directive for affirmative action to uplift backward classes, not to exclude the general category. Universal schemes like PM-KISAN (₹63,500 crore in 2025-26, benefiting 11 crore farmers) and Stand-Up India (loans for entrepreneurs) are open to all, including general category citizens. The 10% EWS quota (introduced in 2019) provides reservations for economically weaker general category individuals in jobs and education. While some argue that targeted schemes create "reverse discrimination," evidence from reports like those from the National Commission for Backward Classes suggests these measures address centuries-old inequalities without systematically disadvantaging the general category—general candidates still access 40-50% of opportunities on merit. Claims of discrimination often overlook that general category poverty is addressed through non-caste-specific anti-poverty programs.


Detailed Survey of Government Welfare Spending, Schemes, and Equity Policies (2014-2025)

This comprehensive review examines the Modi government's welfare expenditures on Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), Other Backward Classes (OBC), and Muslim communities over the last 11 years, based on official data from Union Budgets, Press Information Bureau (PIB) releases, and parliamentary responses. It includes breakdowns of key schemes, budget trends, and a balanced discussion on equity for the general category. The analysis draws from authenticated sources to ensure accuracy, highlighting growth in allocations while noting implementation gaps. Affirmative action in India stems from constitutional mandates (Articles 15-16, 46) to promote social justice for historically marginalized groups, without implying discrimination against others.

Budget Trends and Total Spending Overview

Welfare allocations for SC, ST, OBC, and minorities have seen substantial growth under the Modi government, reflecting a policy emphasis on "Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas" (inclusive development). Cumulative spending exceeds ₹15-20 lakh crore across categories, with annual budgets tripling in some areas. However:

  • SC Welfare: Allocations under the Allocation for Welfare of Scheduled Castes (AWSC) rose from ₹50,548 crore (BE 2014-15) to ₹165,493 crore (BE 2024-25), a 227% increase. Actual expenditure averaged 85-95% of revised estimates, totaling around ₹8-10 lakh crore cumulatively. Key drivers include scholarships and economic empowerment.
  • ST Welfare: Budgets surged from ₹4,498 crore (2014-15) to ₹14,926 crore (2025-26), a 231% rise per PIB data. Cumulative spending: ~₹1-1.5 lakh crore, with focus on tribal development.
  • OBC Welfare: Allocations under schemes like Post-Matric Scholarships grew from ₹1,758 crore (2019-20) to ₹1,970 crore (2021-22), stabilizing at ₹1,800-2,000 crore annually. Total: ~₹20,000-25,000 crore, including skill programs.
  • Minority/Muslim Welfare: Under the Ministry of Minority Affairs, budgets peaked at ₹5,020 crore (2022-23) but declined to ₹3,350 crore (2025-26), a 17% drop from 2014-19 averages. Muslims, comprising ~70% of beneficiaries, received ~₹25,000-30,000 crore cumulatively through scholarships (e.g., 2.37 crore Muslim students benefited 2014-19). Overall minority spending: ₹40,000-45,000 crore.

Challenges include underutilization (e.g., 12.5% decline in minority scheme expenditure 2021-22) due to overlaps and state delays. Data from IndiaStat and Union Budgets show consistent upward trends until recent stabilizations.

Table 1: Year-Wise Allocations for SC/ST/OBC/Minority Welfare (in ₹ Crore, Approximate from Aggregated Sources)

Year SC Welfare (BE) ST Welfare (BE) OBC Welfare (Key Schemes) Minority/Muslim (BE)
2014-15 50,548 4,498 1,710 3,734
2015-16 30,851 ~5,000 1,710 3,738
2016-17 38,833 ~6,000 1,955 3,827
2017-18 52,393 ~7,000 1,955 4,195
2018-19 56,619 ~7,500 1,830 4,700
2019-20 81,341 ~8,000 1,830 4,700
2020-21 83,257 7,511 1,955 ~3,000
2021-22 126,259 7,995 1,970 5,021
2022-23 142,342 8,926 ~2,000 5,021
2023-24 159,148 11,951 ~1,800 3,098
2024-25 165,493 12,491 ~1,800 3,138
2025-26 ~170,000 (Est.) 14,926 ~2,000 3,350

*Sources: Union Budget Expenditure Profiles, PIB, IndiaStat. Note: Minority figures include broader programs; Muslim-specific data is ~70% of totals. Bar chart representation (simulated in markdown for visualization):

text
SC Welfare:  |||||||||||||||||||||||||| (165k Cr in 2024-25)
ST Welfare:  ||||||||||||||| (12k Cr)
OBC Welfare: ||||||||| (1.8k Cr)
Minority:    ||||||| (3.1k Cr)
(Scale: Each | = ~10k Cr)

Specific Schemes and Their Impact

The government runs over 30 targeted schemes, consolidated under umbrellas like PM-AJAY for SCs and PM Vanbandhu Kalyan Yojana for STs. Details:

  • For SCs:
    • Post-Matric Scholarship: ₹6,360 crore (2025-26); benefited 92 lakh students (2023-24).
    • PM-AJAY: ₹2,140 crore (2021-22); village development in SC-majority areas.
    • National Fellowship for SCs: ₹300 crore annually; supports higher education.
  • For STs:
    • Post-Matric Scholarship: ₹2,433 crore (2025-26); 18 lakh beneficiaries.
    • Eklavya Model Residential Schools: 477 sanctioned (up from 123 in 2013-14); ₹1,000 crore+ invested.
    • Pradhan Mantri Adi Adarsh Gram Yojana: Focuses on 1,000+ tribal villages.
  • For OBCs:
    • Post-Matric Scholarship: ₹921 crore (2025-26); 92 lakh beneficiaries cumulatively.
    • Dr. Ambedkar Scheme for OBCs/EBCs: Interest subsidy on overseas loans; ₹250 crore (2025-26).
    • SHREYAS: ₹472 crore for higher education.
  • For Muslims/Minorities:
    • Pre/Post-Matric Scholarships: ₹5,172 crore (2008-2023); 92 lakh beneficiaries, mostly Muslims.
    • Pradhan Mantri Jan Vikas Karyakram: ₹910 crore (2024-25); infrastructure in minority areas.
    • Begum Hazrat Mahal Scholarship: For minority girls; part of ₹678 crore education budget (2025-26).

These schemes have led to outcomes like reduced dropout rates (e.g., SC/ST enrollment up 20% per NFHS data) and increased economic participation (e.g., 71% PM Fasal Bima beneficiaries are SC/ST/OBC).

Table 2: Selected Schemes with Budgets and Beneficiaries (Cumulative 2014-2025)

Scheme Target Group Budget (Cumulative ₹ Cr) Beneficiaries (Approx.)
Post-Matric Scholarship SC 40,000+ 4 crore+
Pre-Matric Scholarship ST 15,000+ 1.5 crore
SHREYAS OBC 5,000 50 lakh
Minority Scholarships Muslims/Minorities 20,000+ 3 crore (2.37 crore Muslims)

Equity for General Category and Discrimination Debates

India's reservation system reserves ~50% seats/jobs for SC/ST/OBC (15% SC, 7.5% ST, 27% OBC), leaving ~40% for merit (open to all) and 10% for EWS in general category (introduced 2019). No schemes are "exclusive" to general category, as policies target backwardness per Constitution. General citizens access universal schemes:

  • PM-KISAN: ₹6,000/year to farmers; 80% small/marginal (includes general).
  • Ayushman Bharat: ₹5 lakh health cover; 55 crore beneficiaries.
  • PMAY: 4 crore houses; open to all BPL/EWS.

Claims of "discrimination" against general category arise from perceptions of "reverse discrimination" in reservations, but Supreme Court rulings (e.g., Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India, 2022) affirm these as tools for substantive equality, not bias. General category poverty (e.g., 10-15% of population) is addressed via EWS and anti-poverty programs. Debates highlight controversies: some view reservations as perpetuating caste divides, while evidence shows they reduce inequality (e.g., SC/ST poverty down 20% per NITI Aayog). No data supports systematic fund denial to general; instead, universal spending (~₹10-15 lakh crore annually) benefits all.

Table 3: Universal Schemes Benefiting General Category (2025-26 Allocations)

Scheme Focus Budget (₹ Cr) Beneficiaries
PM-KISAN Farmer Income 63,500 11 crore
Ayushman Bharat Health Insurance 1,16,000+ 55 crore
PMAY Housing 54,500 4 crore

In summary, while targeted spending uplifts marginalized groups, India's welfare ecosystem ensures broad access, promoting inclusive growth amid ongoing debates.

Key Citations

  • PIB: "Empowering Tribes Towards Viksit Bharat" (2025)
  • Union Budget: "Expenditure Profile 2026-2027"
  • IndiaStat: "Special Component Plan Expenditure"
  • Economic Times: "Union Budget 2025: Boost to Social Justice"
  • Ministry of Minority Affairs: "Empowering Minorities" (2024)
  • Wikipedia: "List of Schemes of the Government of India"
This research has copy right and can not be used by any one unless permission is sought in advance. Only references of this research can be made by indicating researchers credential
Please write your views and comments for furtherring my research efforts on  other important national issues.
Jai Hind Jai Sanatan


via Blogger https://ift.tt/pGmQeS0
February 02, 2026 at 09:37AM
via Blogger https://ift.tt/MmaWUDv
February 02, 2026 at 10:13AM
via Blogger https://ift.tt/kT5Rx3y
February 02, 2026 at 11:13AM

Exclusive research on PM Narendra Modi Govt Spending on SC ST OBC & Muslims of India- 2014-2026

Exclusive research on PM Narendra Modi Govt Spending on SC ST OBC & Muslims of India- 2014-2026
Exclusive research on PM Narendra Modi Govt Spending on SC ST OBC & Muslims of India- 2014-2026

This is my exclusive research on PM Narendra Modi Govt Spending on SC ST OBC & Muslims of India.Research does not include Islamic Countries which are regulary Funded by current Govt to help Muslim Population of those countries

Key Points on Government Spending and Schemes (2014-2025)
  • Research suggests that the Modi government has substantially increased welfare allocations for Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), Other Backward Classes (OBC), and minority communities, including Muslims, over the past 11 years, with budgets rising from around ₹50,000 crore in 2014-15 to over ₹2.5 lakh crore annually by 2025-26 across targeted schemes—reflecting a focus on affirmative action for historically disadvantaged groups.
  • Specific schemes include scholarships, skill development, and economic empowerment programs like Post-Matric Scholarships for SC/ST/OBC (over ₹40,000 crore disbursed since 2014) and minority welfare initiatives (around ₹40,000-45,000 crore cumulative), but data shows uneven utilization in some years due to implementation challenges.
  • There are no exclusive government schemes targeted solely at the general category, as India's affirmative action framework prioritizes backward classes; however, general category citizens benefit from universal programs like PM-KISAN (income support for farmers) and Ayushman Bharat (health insurance), which cover all eligible individuals regardless of caste.
  • Evidence leans toward affirmative action as a tool to address historical inequalities rather than discrimination against the general category; while debates exist on "reverse discrimination" in reservations, constitutional provisions emphasize uplifting marginalized groups without barring general access to merit-based opportunities—any perceived bias is often linked to broader socio-economic complexities.

Overview of Spending on SC, ST, OBC, and Muslim Communities

The Modi government, in power since 2014, has emphasized welfare for disadvantaged groups through increased budgetary allocations. Total spending on SC/ST welfare has grown from approximately ₹30,000-50,000 crore in 2014-15 to over ₹2.5 lakh crore in recent budgets, with a focus on education, skill development, and economic inclusion. For minorities (including Muslims, who form the largest group), allocations under the Ministry of Minority Affairs peaked at around ₹5,000 crore in 2022-23 but have stabilized at ₹3,000-3,500 crore annually, supporting scholarships and development programs. Data from official sources like the Union Budget and PIB indicate a 200-300% rise in tribal welfare budgets alone, though actual expenditure sometimes falls short due to state-level implementation issues.

Key Schemes and Allocations

Major schemes target SC, ST, OBC, and minorities, with detailed budgets drawn from government reports. For instance:

  • Post-Matric Scholarship for SCs: Over ₹30,000 crore disbursed since 2014, benefiting 4 crore+ students (2025-26 allocation: ₹6,000 crore).
  • Pradhan Mantri Adi Adarsh Gram Yojana (for STs): Focuses on tribal village development; budget rose from ₹1,000 crore in 2021-22 to ₹1,500 crore in 2025-26.
  • Post-Matric Scholarship for OBCs: Around ₹10,000 crore spent since 2014; 2025-26: ₹1,000 crore.
  • Minority Scholarships (for Muslims and others): Cumulative ₹20,000 crore+; Pre/Post-Matric schemes benefited 2.5 crore Muslims (2025-26: ₹678 crore for education empowerment).

These schemes aim to bridge socio-economic gaps, with Muslims comprising 70-80% of minority beneficiaries in education programs.

Perspective on General Category and Claims of Discrimination

India's welfare policies are rooted in the Constitution's directive for affirmative action to uplift backward classes, not to exclude the general category. Universal schemes like PM-KISAN (₹63,500 crore in 2025-26, benefiting 11 crore farmers) and Stand-Up India (loans for entrepreneurs) are open to all, including general category citizens. The 10% EWS quota (introduced in 2019) provides reservations for economically weaker general category individuals in jobs and education. While some argue that targeted schemes create "reverse discrimination," evidence from reports like those from the National Commission for Backward Classes suggests these measures address centuries-old inequalities without systematically disadvantaging the general category—general candidates still access 40-50% of opportunities on merit. Claims of discrimination often overlook that general category poverty is addressed through non-caste-specific anti-poverty programs.


Detailed Survey of Government Welfare Spending, Schemes, and Equity Policies (2014-2025)

This comprehensive review examines the Modi government's welfare expenditures on Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), Other Backward Classes (OBC), and Muslim communities over the last 11 years, based on official data from Union Budgets, Press Information Bureau (PIB) releases, and parliamentary responses. It includes breakdowns of key schemes, budget trends, and a balanced discussion on equity for the general category. The analysis draws from authenticated sources to ensure accuracy, highlighting growth in allocations while noting implementation gaps. Affirmative action in India stems from constitutional mandates (Articles 15-16, 46) to promote social justice for historically marginalized groups, without implying discrimination against others.

Budget Trends and Total Spending Overview

Welfare allocations for SC, ST, OBC, and minorities have seen substantial growth under the Modi government, reflecting a policy emphasis on "Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas" (inclusive development). Cumulative spending exceeds ₹15-20 lakh crore across categories, with annual budgets tripling in some areas. However:

  • SC Welfare: Allocations under the Allocation for Welfare of Scheduled Castes (AWSC) rose from ₹50,548 crore (BE 2014-15) to ₹165,493 crore (BE 2024-25), a 227% increase. Actual expenditure averaged 85-95% of revised estimates, totaling around ₹8-10 lakh crore cumulatively. Key drivers include scholarships and economic empowerment.
  • ST Welfare: Budgets surged from ₹4,498 crore (2014-15) to ₹14,926 crore (2025-26), a 231% rise per PIB data. Cumulative spending: ~₹1-1.5 lakh crore, with focus on tribal development.
  • OBC Welfare: Allocations under schemes like Post-Matric Scholarships grew from ₹1,758 crore (2019-20) to ₹1,970 crore (2021-22), stabilizing at ₹1,800-2,000 crore annually. Total: ~₹20,000-25,000 crore, including skill programs.
  • Minority/Muslim Welfare: Under the Ministry of Minority Affairs, budgets peaked at ₹5,020 crore (2022-23) but declined to ₹3,350 crore (2025-26), a 17% drop from 2014-19 averages. Muslims, comprising ~70% of beneficiaries, received ~₹25,000-30,000 crore cumulatively through scholarships (e.g., 2.37 crore Muslim students benefited 2014-19). Overall minority spending: ₹40,000-45,000 crore.

Challenges include underutilization (e.g., 12.5% decline in minority scheme expenditure 2021-22) due to overlaps and state delays. Data from IndiaStat and Union Budgets show consistent upward trends until recent stabilizations.

Table 1: Year-Wise Allocations for SC/ST/OBC/Minority Welfare (in ₹ Crore, Approximate from Aggregated Sources)

Year SC Welfare (BE) ST Welfare (BE) OBC Welfare (Key Schemes) Minority/Muslim (BE)
2014-15 50,548 4,498 1,710 3,734
2015-16 30,851 ~5,000 1,710 3,738
2016-17 38,833 ~6,000 1,955 3,827
2017-18 52,393 ~7,000 1,955 4,195
2018-19 56,619 ~7,500 1,830 4,700
2019-20 81,341 ~8,000 1,830 4,700
2020-21 83,257 7,511 1,955 ~3,000
2021-22 126,259 7,995 1,970 5,021
2022-23 142,342 8,926 ~2,000 5,021
2023-24 159,148 11,951 ~1,800 3,098
2024-25 165,493 12,491 ~1,800 3,138
2025-26 ~170,000 (Est.) 14,926 ~2,000 3,350

*Sources: Union Budget Expenditure Profiles, PIB, IndiaStat. Note: Minority figures include broader programs; Muslim-specific data is ~70% of totals. Bar chart representation (simulated in markdown for visualization):

text
SC Welfare:  |||||||||||||||||||||||||| (165k Cr in 2024-25)
ST Welfare:  ||||||||||||||| (12k Cr)
OBC Welfare: ||||||||| (1.8k Cr)
Minority:    ||||||| (3.1k Cr)
(Scale: Each | = ~10k Cr)

Specific Schemes and Their Impact

The government runs over 30 targeted schemes, consolidated under umbrellas like PM-AJAY for SCs and PM Vanbandhu Kalyan Yojana for STs. Details:

  • For SCs:
    • Post-Matric Scholarship: ₹6,360 crore (2025-26); benefited 92 lakh students (2023-24).
    • PM-AJAY: ₹2,140 crore (2021-22); village development in SC-majority areas.
    • National Fellowship for SCs: ₹300 crore annually; supports higher education.
  • For STs:
    • Post-Matric Scholarship: ₹2,433 crore (2025-26); 18 lakh beneficiaries.
    • Eklavya Model Residential Schools: 477 sanctioned (up from 123 in 2013-14); ₹1,000 crore+ invested.
    • Pradhan Mantri Adi Adarsh Gram Yojana: Focuses on 1,000+ tribal villages.
  • For OBCs:
    • Post-Matric Scholarship: ₹921 crore (2025-26); 92 lakh beneficiaries cumulatively.
    • Dr. Ambedkar Scheme for OBCs/EBCs: Interest subsidy on overseas loans; ₹250 crore (2025-26).
    • SHREYAS: ₹472 crore for higher education.
  • For Muslims/Minorities:
    • Pre/Post-Matric Scholarships: ₹5,172 crore (2008-2023); 92 lakh beneficiaries, mostly Muslims.
    • Pradhan Mantri Jan Vikas Karyakram: ₹910 crore (2024-25); infrastructure in minority areas.
    • Begum Hazrat Mahal Scholarship: For minority girls; part of ₹678 crore education budget (2025-26).

These schemes have led to outcomes like reduced dropout rates (e.g., SC/ST enrollment up 20% per NFHS data) and increased economic participation (e.g., 71% PM Fasal Bima beneficiaries are SC/ST/OBC).

Table 2: Selected Schemes with Budgets and Beneficiaries (Cumulative 2014-2025)

Scheme Target Group Budget (Cumulative ₹ Cr) Beneficiaries (Approx.)
Post-Matric Scholarship SC 40,000+ 4 crore+
Pre-Matric Scholarship ST 15,000+ 1.5 crore
SHREYAS OBC 5,000 50 lakh
Minority Scholarships Muslims/Minorities 20,000+ 3 crore (2.37 crore Muslims)

Equity for General Category and Discrimination Debates

India's reservation system reserves ~50% seats/jobs for SC/ST/OBC (15% SC, 7.5% ST, 27% OBC), leaving ~40% for merit (open to all) and 10% for EWS in general category (introduced 2019). No schemes are "exclusive" to general category, as policies target backwardness per Constitution. General citizens access universal schemes:

  • PM-KISAN: ₹6,000/year to farmers; 80% small/marginal (includes general).
  • Ayushman Bharat: ₹5 lakh health cover; 55 crore beneficiaries.
  • PMAY: 4 crore houses; open to all BPL/EWS.

Claims of "discrimination" against general category arise from perceptions of "reverse discrimination" in reservations, but Supreme Court rulings (e.g., Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India, 2022) affirm these as tools for substantive equality, not bias. General category poverty (e.g., 10-15% of population) is addressed via EWS and anti-poverty programs. Debates highlight controversies: some view reservations as perpetuating caste divides, while evidence shows they reduce inequality (e.g., SC/ST poverty down 20% per NITI Aayog). No data supports systematic fund denial to general; instead, universal spending (~₹10-15 lakh crore annually) benefits all.

Table 3: Universal Schemes Benefiting General Category (2025-26 Allocations)

Scheme Focus Budget (₹ Cr) Beneficiaries
PM-KISAN Farmer Income 63,500 11 crore
Ayushman Bharat Health Insurance 1,16,000+ 55 crore
PMAY Housing 54,500 4 crore

In summary, while targeted spending uplifts marginalized groups, India's welfare ecosystem ensures broad access, promoting inclusive growth amid ongoing debates.

Key Citations

  • PIB: "Empowering Tribes Towards Viksit Bharat" (2025)
  • Union Budget: "Expenditure Profile 2026-2027"
  • IndiaStat: "Special Component Plan Expenditure"
  • Economic Times: "Union Budget 2025: Boost to Social Justice"
  • Ministry of Minority Affairs: "Empowering Minorities" (2024)
  • Wikipedia: "List of Schemes of the Government of India"
This research has copy right and can not be used by any one unless permission is sought in advance. Only references of this research can be made by indicating researchers credential
Please write your views and comments for furtherring my research efforts on  other important national issues.
Jai Hind Jai Sanatan


via Blogger https://ift.tt/pGmQeS0
February 02, 2026 at 09:37AM
via Blogger https://ift.tt/MmaWUDv
February 02, 2026 at 10:13AM

Exclusive research on PM Narendra Modi Govt Spending on SC ST OBC & Muslims of India- 2014-2026

Exclusive research on PM Narendra Modi Govt Spending on SC ST OBC & Muslims of India- 2014-2026

This is my exclusive research on PM Narendra Modi Govt Spending on SC ST OBC & Muslims of India.Research does not include Islamic Countries which are regulary Funded by current Govt to help Muslim Population of those countries

Key Points on Government Spending and Schemes (2014-2025)
  • Research suggests that the Modi government has substantially increased welfare allocations for Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), Other Backward Classes (OBC), and minority communities, including Muslims, over the past 11 years, with budgets rising from around ₹50,000 crore in 2014-15 to over ₹2.5 lakh crore annually by 2025-26 across targeted schemes—reflecting a focus on affirmative action for historically disadvantaged groups.
  • Specific schemes include scholarships, skill development, and economic empowerment programs like Post-Matric Scholarships for SC/ST/OBC (over ₹40,000 crore disbursed since 2014) and minority welfare initiatives (around ₹40,000-45,000 crore cumulative), but data shows uneven utilization in some years due to implementation challenges.
  • There are no exclusive government schemes targeted solely at the general category, as India's affirmative action framework prioritizes backward classes; however, general category citizens benefit from universal programs like PM-KISAN (income support for farmers) and Ayushman Bharat (health insurance), which cover all eligible individuals regardless of caste.
  • Evidence leans toward affirmative action as a tool to address historical inequalities rather than discrimination against the general category; while debates exist on "reverse discrimination" in reservations, constitutional provisions emphasize uplifting marginalized groups without barring general access to merit-based opportunities—any perceived bias is often linked to broader socio-economic complexities.

Overview of Spending on SC, ST, OBC, and Muslim Communities

The Modi government, in power since 2014, has emphasized welfare for disadvantaged groups through increased budgetary allocations. Total spending on SC/ST welfare has grown from approximately ₹30,000-50,000 crore in 2014-15 to over ₹2.5 lakh crore in recent budgets, with a focus on education, skill development, and economic inclusion. For minorities (including Muslims, who form the largest group), allocations under the Ministry of Minority Affairs peaked at around ₹5,000 crore in 2022-23 but have stabilized at ₹3,000-3,500 crore annually, supporting scholarships and development programs. Data from official sources like the Union Budget and PIB indicate a 200-300% rise in tribal welfare budgets alone, though actual expenditure sometimes falls short due to state-level implementation issues.

Key Schemes and Allocations

Major schemes target SC, ST, OBC, and minorities, with detailed budgets drawn from government reports. For instance:

  • Post-Matric Scholarship for SCs: Over ₹30,000 crore disbursed since 2014, benefiting 4 crore+ students (2025-26 allocation: ₹6,000 crore).
  • Pradhan Mantri Adi Adarsh Gram Yojana (for STs): Focuses on tribal village development; budget rose from ₹1,000 crore in 2021-22 to ₹1,500 crore in 2025-26.
  • Post-Matric Scholarship for OBCs: Around ₹10,000 crore spent since 2014; 2025-26: ₹1,000 crore.
  • Minority Scholarships (for Muslims and others): Cumulative ₹20,000 crore+; Pre/Post-Matric schemes benefited 2.5 crore Muslims (2025-26: ₹678 crore for education empowerment).

These schemes aim to bridge socio-economic gaps, with Muslims comprising 70-80% of minority beneficiaries in education programs.

Perspective on General Category and Claims of Discrimination

India's welfare policies are rooted in the Constitution's directive for affirmative action to uplift backward classes, not to exclude the general category. Universal schemes like PM-KISAN (₹63,500 crore in 2025-26, benefiting 11 crore farmers) and Stand-Up India (loans for entrepreneurs) are open to all, including general category citizens. The 10% EWS quota (introduced in 2019) provides reservations for economically weaker general category individuals in jobs and education. While some argue that targeted schemes create "reverse discrimination," evidence from reports like those from the National Commission for Backward Classes suggests these measures address centuries-old inequalities without systematically disadvantaging the general category—general candidates still access 40-50% of opportunities on merit. Claims of discrimination often overlook that general category poverty is addressed through non-caste-specific anti-poverty programs.


Detailed Survey of Government Welfare Spending, Schemes, and Equity Policies (2014-2025)

This comprehensive review examines the Modi government's welfare expenditures on Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), Other Backward Classes (OBC), and Muslim communities over the last 11 years, based on official data from Union Budgets, Press Information Bureau (PIB) releases, and parliamentary responses. It includes breakdowns of key schemes, budget trends, and a balanced discussion on equity for the general category. The analysis draws from authenticated sources to ensure accuracy, highlighting growth in allocations while noting implementation gaps. Affirmative action in India stems from constitutional mandates (Articles 15-16, 46) to promote social justice for historically marginalized groups, without implying discrimination against others.

Budget Trends and Total Spending Overview

Welfare allocations for SC, ST, OBC, and minorities have seen substantial growth under the Modi government, reflecting a policy emphasis on "Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas" (inclusive development). Cumulative spending exceeds ₹15-20 lakh crore across categories, with annual budgets tripling in some areas. However:

  • SC Welfare: Allocations under the Allocation for Welfare of Scheduled Castes (AWSC) rose from ₹50,548 crore (BE 2014-15) to ₹165,493 crore (BE 2024-25), a 227% increase. Actual expenditure averaged 85-95% of revised estimates, totaling around ₹8-10 lakh crore cumulatively. Key drivers include scholarships and economic empowerment.
  • ST Welfare: Budgets surged from ₹4,498 crore (2014-15) to ₹14,926 crore (2025-26), a 231% rise per PIB data. Cumulative spending: ~₹1-1.5 lakh crore, with focus on tribal development.
  • OBC Welfare: Allocations under schemes like Post-Matric Scholarships grew from ₹1,758 crore (2019-20) to ₹1,970 crore (2021-22), stabilizing at ₹1,800-2,000 crore annually. Total: ~₹20,000-25,000 crore, including skill programs.
  • Minority/Muslim Welfare: Under the Ministry of Minority Affairs, budgets peaked at ₹5,020 crore (2022-23) but declined to ₹3,350 crore (2025-26), a 17% drop from 2014-19 averages. Muslims, comprising ~70% of beneficiaries, received ~₹25,000-30,000 crore cumulatively through scholarships (e.g., 2.37 crore Muslim students benefited 2014-19). Overall minority spending: ₹40,000-45,000 crore.

Challenges include underutilization (e.g., 12.5% decline in minority scheme expenditure 2021-22) due to overlaps and state delays. Data from IndiaStat and Union Budgets show consistent upward trends until recent stabilizations.

Table 1: Year-Wise Allocations for SC/ST/OBC/Minority Welfare (in ₹ Crore, Approximate from Aggregated Sources)

Year SC Welfare (BE) ST Welfare (BE) OBC Welfare (Key Schemes) Minority/Muslim (BE)
2014-15 50,548 4,498 1,710 3,734
2015-16 30,851 ~5,000 1,710 3,738
2016-17 38,833 ~6,000 1,955 3,827
2017-18 52,393 ~7,000 1,955 4,195
2018-19 56,619 ~7,500 1,830 4,700
2019-20 81,341 ~8,000 1,830 4,700
2020-21 83,257 7,511 1,955 ~3,000
2021-22 126,259 7,995 1,970 5,021
2022-23 142,342 8,926 ~2,000 5,021
2023-24 159,148 11,951 ~1,800 3,098
2024-25 165,493 12,491 ~1,800 3,138
2025-26 ~170,000 (Est.) 14,926 ~2,000 3,350

*Sources: Union Budget Expenditure Profiles, PIB, IndiaStat. Note: Minority figures include broader programs; Muslim-specific data is ~70% of totals. Bar chart representation (simulated in markdown for visualization):

text
SC Welfare:  |||||||||||||||||||||||||| (165k Cr in 2024-25)
ST Welfare:  ||||||||||||||| (12k Cr)
OBC Welfare: ||||||||| (1.8k Cr)
Minority:    ||||||| (3.1k Cr)
(Scale: Each | = ~10k Cr)

Specific Schemes and Their Impact

The government runs over 30 targeted schemes, consolidated under umbrellas like PM-AJAY for SCs and PM Vanbandhu Kalyan Yojana for STs. Details:

  • For SCs:
    • Post-Matric Scholarship: ₹6,360 crore (2025-26); benefited 92 lakh students (2023-24).
    • PM-AJAY: ₹2,140 crore (2021-22); village development in SC-majority areas.
    • National Fellowship for SCs: ₹300 crore annually; supports higher education.
  • For STs:
    • Post-Matric Scholarship: ₹2,433 crore (2025-26); 18 lakh beneficiaries.
    • Eklavya Model Residential Schools: 477 sanctioned (up from 123 in 2013-14); ₹1,000 crore+ invested.
    • Pradhan Mantri Adi Adarsh Gram Yojana: Focuses on 1,000+ tribal villages.
  • For OBCs:
    • Post-Matric Scholarship: ₹921 crore (2025-26); 92 lakh beneficiaries cumulatively.
    • Dr. Ambedkar Scheme for OBCs/EBCs: Interest subsidy on overseas loans; ₹250 crore (2025-26).
    • SHREYAS: ₹472 crore for higher education.
  • For Muslims/Minorities:
    • Pre/Post-Matric Scholarships: ₹5,172 crore (2008-2023); 92 lakh beneficiaries, mostly Muslims.
    • Pradhan Mantri Jan Vikas Karyakram: ₹910 crore (2024-25); infrastructure in minority areas.
    • Begum Hazrat Mahal Scholarship: For minority girls; part of ₹678 crore education budget (2025-26).

These schemes have led to outcomes like reduced dropout rates (e.g., SC/ST enrollment up 20% per NFHS data) and increased economic participation (e.g., 71% PM Fasal Bima beneficiaries are SC/ST/OBC).

Table 2: Selected Schemes with Budgets and Beneficiaries (Cumulative 2014-2025)

Scheme Target Group Budget (Cumulative ₹ Cr) Beneficiaries (Approx.)
Post-Matric Scholarship SC 40,000+ 4 crore+
Pre-Matric Scholarship ST 15,000+ 1.5 crore
SHREYAS OBC 5,000 50 lakh
Minority Scholarships Muslims/Minorities 20,000+ 3 crore (2.37 crore Muslims)

Equity for General Category and Discrimination Debates

India's reservation system reserves ~50% seats/jobs for SC/ST/OBC (15% SC, 7.5% ST, 27% OBC), leaving ~40% for merit (open to all) and 10% for EWS in general category (introduced 2019). No schemes are "exclusive" to general category, as policies target backwardness per Constitution. General citizens access universal schemes:

  • PM-KISAN: ₹6,000/year to farmers; 80% small/marginal (includes general).
  • Ayushman Bharat: ₹5 lakh health cover; 55 crore beneficiaries.
  • PMAY: 4 crore houses; open to all BPL/EWS.

Claims of "discrimination" against general category arise from perceptions of "reverse discrimination" in reservations, but Supreme Court rulings (e.g., Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India, 2022) affirm these as tools for substantive equality, not bias. General category poverty (e.g., 10-15% of population) is addressed via EWS and anti-poverty programs. Debates highlight controversies: some view reservations as perpetuating caste divides, while evidence shows they reduce inequality (e.g., SC/ST poverty down 20% per NITI Aayog). No data supports systematic fund denial to general; instead, universal spending (~₹10-15 lakh crore annually) benefits all.

Table 3: Universal Schemes Benefiting General Category (2025-26 Allocations)

Scheme Focus Budget (₹ Cr) Beneficiaries
PM-KISAN Farmer Income 63,500 11 crore
Ayushman Bharat Health Insurance 1,16,000+ 55 crore
PMAY Housing 54,500 4 crore

In summary, while targeted spending uplifts marginalized groups, India's welfare ecosystem ensures broad access, promoting inclusive growth amid ongoing debates.

Key Citations

  • PIB: "Empowering Tribes Towards Viksit Bharat" (2025)
  • Union Budget: "Expenditure Profile 2026-2027"
  • IndiaStat: "Special Component Plan Expenditure"
  • Economic Times: "Union Budget 2025: Boost to Social Justice"
  • Ministry of Minority Affairs: "Empowering Minorities" (2024)
  • Wikipedia: "List of Schemes of the Government of India"
This research has copy right and can not be used by any one unless permission is sought in advance. Only references of this research can be made by indicating researchers credential
Please write your views and comments for furtherring my research efforts on  other important national issues.
Jai Hind Jai Sanatan


via Blogger https://ift.tt/pGmQeS0
February 02, 2026 at 09:37AM

Thursday, January 22, 2026

Supreme Court Hearing on the ED Investigation Against Mamata Banerjee’s Government

Supreme Court Hearing on the ED Investigation Against Mamata Banerjee’s Government
Supreme Court Hearing on the ED Investigation Against Mamata Banerjee’s Government
Supreme Court Hearing on the ED Investigation Against Mamata Banerjee’s Government
Supreme Court Hearing on the ED Investigation Against Mamata Banerjee’s Government

  Supreme Court Hearing on the ED Investigation Against Mamata Banerjee’s Government

  • The summary opens by highlighting the growing public awareness (“जन गंगा”) regarding judicial and investigative actions in India, particularly in politically sensitive cases.
  • It discusses the ongoing Enforcement Directorate (ED) investigation against West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee’s government, focusing on allegations of money laundering and corruption related to coal purchases.
  • The Supreme Court hearing brought significant attention to the case, revealing the court’s firm stance against any interference with the ED’s constitutional authority to investigate.
  • Senior advocate Kapil Sibal attempted to pressurize the Supreme Court by publicly criticizing the ED and alleging misuse of authority, especially targeting opposition states before elections.
  • However, the Supreme Court rejected these arguments, affirming that the ED cannot be restrained from performing its duties even during electoral times.
  • The court mandated that Mamata Banerjee’s government must respond within two weeks with all CCTV and video footage related to the case.


Key Legal Arguments and Court’s Responses

  • Kapil Sibal argued that the ED’s powers under the UAPA (Unlawful Activities Prevention Act) needed review to prevent misuse.
  • The Supreme Court refuted this, emphasizing that if money laundering allegations arise during elections, the ED must investigate regardless of timing.
  • The government’s lawyers, including ASG S.B. Raju and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, strongly defended the ED’s actions, stating that:
    • The allegations involved crores of rupees in money laundering linked to a coal purchase scam.
    • The evidence was seized lawfully, countering claims made by Mamata Banerjee’s side that ED officials stole documents.
    • The documents were allegedly taken by Mamata Banerjee herself, which should be investigated by the CBI due to lack of trust in state police.

Details of the Money Laundering Case

  • The case involves cash payments for coal procurement linked to a company named IPAC, which is reportedly connected to political strategist Prashant Kishor.
  • Sibal claimed sensitive election-related data (SIR data) was stored in IPAC’s offices, suggesting possible misuse.
  • The Solicitor General countered that the SIR data is publicly available on websites, making such theft illogical.
  • The Supreme Court questioned Kapil Sibal’s arguments rigorously, undermining his position.


Demand for Accountability of West Bengal Police Officials

  • The ED and Solicitor General called for action against senior West Bengal police officials:
    • Rajeev Kumar, former Kolkata Police Commissioner and current West Bengal DGP.
    • Kolkata Police Commissioner and other officers accused of misconduct toward ED officials.
  • The Supreme Court assured strict action against any guilty officers.
  • The court’s firm stance marks a departure from past leniency during similar cases.


Historical Context of Police and Political Interference

  • Rajeev Kumar has previously been involved in high-profile cases, including a CBI investigation against him.
  • The court revealed incidents where police obstructed ED investigations, threatening FIRs against ED officers.
  • The High Court was also criticized for not supporting the ED adequately, with allegations of orchestrated disruptions during hearings.


Judicial Independence and Challenges to Political Influence

  • The judges, particularly Justice P.K. Mishra and Justice Vipul Pancholi, openly challenged Kapil Sibal’s tactics and exposed the arrogance of some lawyers who assume judicial compliance due to prior influence or collegium connections.
  • The video highlights Sibal’s informal and disrespectful treatment of retired judges on his YouTube channel as an example of his attitude.
  • The court’s questioning signals a crackdown on attempts to manipulate judicial processes through political or personal influence.


Mamata Banerjee’s Media Strategy and Public Allegations

  • After the raids on IPAC offices and premises of Prateek Jain (IPAC owner), Mamata Banerjee accused the Union Home Minister of involvement in coal smuggling and funnelling money via Shubhendu Adhikari.
  • Contrarily, evidence showed Mamata’s police officers forcibly taking control of ED’s evidence, including laptops and phones, obstructing the investigation.
  • This pattern of obstruction has reportedly occurred repeatedly in the past seven instances.


Public Awareness and Judicial Accountability

  • The article stresses the increasing public awareness and engagement with judicial matters, which is influencing courts to take stronger stands.
  • It notes that many High Court judges are now showing patriotism and courage in delivering strong judgments.
  • While some Supreme Court judges’ decisions remain controversial, the overall trend is toward asserting judicial independence against political pressures.
  • The confrontation in this case between Mamata Banerjee’s government and the judiciary/ED is seen as a positive sign for rule of law and governance.


Call for Continued Civic Engagement and Transparency

  • The presenter urges citizens and activists to continue spreading awareness about judicial proceedings and governmental accountability.
  • He emphasizes that the judiciary must be transparent and accountable to the people, who are the ultimate “owners” of the nation.
  • Public vigilance and pressure on public servants and judicial officers are vital to prevent corruption and abuse of power.
  • The video encourages sharing such information widely to educate the general public in simple language about the ongoing judicial processes.

via Blogger https://ift.tt/xyhD3iC
January 21, 2026 at 09:23PM
via Blogger https://ift.tt/6iLjSYn
January 21, 2026 at 10:13PM
via Blogger https://ift.tt/dM0jWel
January 21, 2026 at 11:13PM
via Blogger https://ift.tt/Kbde3rQ
January 22, 2026 at 12:13AM

Exclusive research on PM Narendra Modi Govt Spending on SC ST OBC & Muslims of India- 2014-2026

Exclusive research on PM Narendra Modi Govt Spending on SC ST OBC & Muslims of India- 2014-2026 Exclusive research on PM Narendra Modi ...