Hush money trial judge delivers this instruction to jurors deliberating over Donald Trump's fate
Hush money trial judge delivers this instruction to jurors deliberating over Donald Trump's fate
Dear Readers
We need your support in monetory form either through Pay Pal on shuksrp@gmail.com or UPI 9868031897@ybl as our staff has increased and also we changed old IT hardware with new ones.
Witness credibility questioned in Donald Trump's hush money case as jury deliberates without needing his testimony.
Former US President Donald Trump just sat back and listened to the New York hush money case judge as he began instructing the jury on what could potentially be detrimental to his defence.
Judge Juan Merchan, directing the jury, said that while the prosecution is required to prove the case against Trump, it cannot be legally argued that Trump must testify for the jury to determine whether he is guilty or not beyond a “reasonable doubt.”
Merchan clarified that the jury does not need to agree on what specific crime Trump allegedly attempted to conceal by falsifying documents.
While listening to instructions from within the courtroom, Ukraine-born George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley remarked, “Merchan just delivered the coup de grace instruction.”
Merchan said that the jurors “can disagree on what the crime was among the three choices” suggested by the prosecutors, Turley stated these as violation of tax laws, other business records and the Federal Election Campaign Act. “Thus, this means that they could split 4-4-4 and he will still treat them as unanimous,” he further said.
Michael Cohen's testimony needs confirmation, judge tells jury.
Marchan noted that the jury would need to reach a unanimous decision on each charge of falsifying business records, but legal scholars in the room agreed that there didn't seem to be much room for a split verdict or for Trump to be found guilty or convicted. Not guilty.
"It's either 34 guilty verdicts, 34 not guilty verdicts, or the jury doesn't agree," former federal prosecutor Trey Gowdy said.
"I can't imagine a verdict that would convict on some counts and acquit on others." Marchan defined the concept of reasonable doubt for the jury to use in the trial, explaining: "It is knowable without a degree of uncertainty," but "not sufficient to conclude that the defendant is probably guilty."
The judge also addressed witnesses called by the prosecution in the case, including Michael Cohen, the former president and attorney accused of falsifying business records and misappropriating $130,000 meant for payments to porn star Stormy Daniels.
Dear Readers
We need your support in monetory form either through Pay Pal on shuksrp@gmail.com or UPI 9868031897@ybl as our staff has increased and also we changed old IT hardware with new ones.
#IsraelHamasWar #IDF #Israelairstrikes #IsraeldestroyingHamasTunnels #Gaza #Hezbollah #IslamicTerrorism #USPresident #Biden #IlonMusk #PMModi #Egypt #Lebanon #IronDome #USTroops #shuksgyan #pmmodi #netanyahu #lebanon #idf #israelarmy #alshifa #iraniandrone #Houthyterrorists #donaldtrump #republicantrump #uspresidentialimmunity #barackobama #isis #moscowattack #putin #usa #trumpforpresident #joeretardbiden #idf #abkobar400paar #narendramodi #bjp370 #Trudeau #canadawithkhalistan #trudeauwithkhalistan #sjaishankar
Comments